"OtherKin is a religion that is rooted from Native American folklore.
Every member of this religion is called a Kin. Every group of Kin has a leader, who is called the Alfa Kin. Kin Pups are new members of the group. Your title will be changed once you find your spirit animal."
No. No no no no no. No. No. Noooo. No. Nonononononononono. No. Just no.
Every member of this religion is called a Kin. Every group of Kin has a leader, who is called the Alfa Kin. Kin Pups are new members of the group. Your title will be changed once you find your spirit animal."
No. No no no no no. No. No. Noooo. No. Nonononononononono. No. Just no.
Tags:
no subject
You sure they didn't maybe just misappropriate a word? Or coin it independently with no idea that it already had a meaning? What's the wider context here?
no subject
As for context, there's not much. It's the description for a group: http://world.secondlife.com/group/9e94ea80-a620-99e8-3507-9469735d1cd6?lang=en-US
The owner seems to be involved in the furry community, so I'd find it a little odd if they were oblivious about the otherkin community and just happened to use the same term.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*sigh* Someday I'm going to try to explain otherkin to an outsider, and they'll say, "Oh, you mean like in those romance novels? You can physically shift and you have glorious abs?"
And I will say YES THAT IS EXACTLY RIGHT.Er, no, no, I mean, I will be disgusted at the prospect of having to explain that some words can mean two completely different things, and it's not like that at all, and that I didn't appropriate a concept from pulp to describe myself. Or at least not from that pulp.no subject
Also, the therianthropy community on LJ (http://therianthropy.livejournal.com/profile) was created in 2002, prior to the Anya Bast novels, and they appear to have used the same spelling: "Therianthropists and OtherKin Community Journal".
On the subject of the fiction, though, I'm disgusted that people have actually used the term for anything in fiction in the first place. One of the reasons otherkin was used rather than simply elf or dragon or fae, etc, was to help distinguish between resources talking about real people identifying as these beings and fictional sources/rpgs or mythological material.
I'm also extremely disgusted by the rising tide of people using "otherkin" to refer to nonhuman spirits whether they are incarnate or not. Devas, fae, etc.
no subject
no subject
Don't judge me, I'm tired.
no subject
no subject
(Not to mention that pretty much most First Nations mythologies AT BEST considered shapeshifting something that shamans did, and usually shamans that would definitely be considered "left hand path" at best in neopagan terminology; if it wasn't something the result of shamanic activity, it was the result of PERMANENT rituals (I'm thinking how the Ani Yona became bears) or because you basically spent too long in the spirit world and ate food offered you by the spirit people. All in all it was considered something Very Dangerous, not the least to one's sense of self.)
And I expect there would be at least some folks who would raise all manner of hell once the whole bastardisation-of-totemism is brought in... (Yes, I have known weres who were "totemic weres", in that they had a close relationship with an Animal Master and were occasionally "ridden" by said Animal Master; no, they didn't try to set up some organised religion based on a bastardisation of pack structure.)
(And as an aside, this is one of many, many, many reasons I avoid Second Life like I would avoid the lovechild of Ebola Zaire and Vietnamese Duck Flu. :P
no subject
amazing what people can come up with, isn't it?
no subject
no subject
good to meet you here. ^_^
oh, user-icon is of an old piece of my silverwork: triple-strand spiral of cast-silver wire, wrought into a star mostly as an experiment of fabrication, not really wearable, nor was it meant to be.
the leaf in the background is a bigleaf-maple (Quercus macrophyllum) from the Olympic rainforest of Washington State.