This is primarily directed towards
stardansr and
orthaevelve, since I forgot to ask it during their workshop, but anyone else that would like to chime in should also feel free:
How does one determine if a given author on the subject of herbalism knows their stuff without having to go through each entry on a particular herb individually and cross reference it against 20 other books, especially when the bad books have a tendency to quote each other and might actually have more points of agreement between them than reputable books due to the sheer volume of crap that gets published?
How does one determine if a given author on the subject of herbalism knows their stuff without having to go through each entry on a particular herb individually and cross reference it against 20 other books, especially when the bad books have a tendency to quote each other and might actually have more points of agreement between them than reputable books due to the sheer volume of crap that gets published?
no subject
no subject
no subject
With other authors, I check their recommendations against my own experience. For example, I know mint is a carminative and good for stomach cramps and headaches, and intestinal cramps. I also know it makes acid reflux worse. So if a new writer goes on and on about how mint prevents gallstones, I will definitely be raising my eyebrows and putting the book in the "dubious" pile until I check it against one of Duke's books. Then I check it against Grieve's two volume set of "A Modern Herbal", which is hell to plow through but my main other reference.
So I do a lot of cross-referencing, and I also tend to look herbs up in my herbal PDR if I am unsure. Common sense is important too, such as in the case of that idiot who recommended putting castor oil in your eyes to get rid of redness. Dumbass.