A lot of people seem disappointed with the iPad. It's very clearly not as powerful as a netbook. It doesn't even run OSX, it runs the same OS as the iPod Touch or iPhone. Considering that I tend to be critical of netbooks to begin with, and especially take issue with the MacBook Air, you're probably thinking I'm one of them.
Surprise. I love the iPad and am seriously thinking about getting one when they become commercially available. My main reservations have far more to do with Apple First-Gen hardware trends (both unexpected bugs and a quickly-lowered price point) than with any technical aspects of the iPad that I am currently aware of.
The thing that most people don't seem to be keeping in mind is that the iPad is meant to be something fundamentally different from a laptop or netbook. A laptop is meant to be a portable computer. A netbook is meant to be a cheap laptop that doesn't need to be quite as powerful. The iPad, on the other hand, is not meant to be a portable computer. It's meant to be the first of a new class of devices. To borrow a term from fiction, let's call these "Personal Access Display Devices". It's meant for viewing information and media (including internet, email, and chat), and some limited editing/creation/manipulation of said information and media. It's meant as a peripheral device to a more advanced computer system, not as a replacement for the computer system itself. As time progresses, it may even become a major input and output device for the main computer system. It's potential is literally game-changing.
I just have one question for Steve Jobs, though. Or, perhaps, a challenge: when am I going to see an Apple Tricorder?
Surprise. I love the iPad and am seriously thinking about getting one when they become commercially available. My main reservations have far more to do with Apple First-Gen hardware trends (both unexpected bugs and a quickly-lowered price point) than with any technical aspects of the iPad that I am currently aware of.
The thing that most people don't seem to be keeping in mind is that the iPad is meant to be something fundamentally different from a laptop or netbook. A laptop is meant to be a portable computer. A netbook is meant to be a cheap laptop that doesn't need to be quite as powerful. The iPad, on the other hand, is not meant to be a portable computer. It's meant to be the first of a new class of devices. To borrow a term from fiction, let's call these "Personal Access Display Devices". It's meant for viewing information and media (including internet, email, and chat), and some limited editing/creation/manipulation of said information and media. It's meant as a peripheral device to a more advanced computer system, not as a replacement for the computer system itself. As time progresses, it may even become a major input and output device for the main computer system. It's potential is literally game-changing.
I just have one question for Steve Jobs, though. Or, perhaps, a challenge: when am I going to see an Apple Tricorder?
Tags:
no subject
no subject
My only real reservations are that a) Apple always releases products and then brings the price down significantly later, and b) many first-gen Apple products end up having significant unanticipated flaws that are fixed in later generations. I just haven't decided if these reservations actually apply to the iPad since Apple says specifically that they tried to price it as affordably as possible and it really is just a further evolution of the already-existing iPod Touch/iPhone technology so may not truly be first-gen in the same sense.
no subject
Yes, case, definitely. Protective value, plus it just looks cool. I wanted to name my iPad "Spellbook" if I got one. >.>
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And also all the things you talk about.
I've thought about it from the music standpoint - as a sheet music storage device, for example. Turning pages automatically or at least a lot more easily, maybe with a remote device prompter you could operate with your foot.
Oh man. If I still wrote code I'd write this in a heartbeat. Seriously.
no subject