December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
34 5 6789
1011 12 13141516
1718 19 20212223
2425 2627282930
31      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Saturday, February 6th, 2010 01:15 am
A lot of people seem disappointed with the iPad. It's very clearly not as powerful as a netbook. It doesn't even run OSX, it runs the same OS as the iPod Touch or iPhone. Considering that I tend to be critical of netbooks to begin with, and especially take issue with the MacBook Air, you're probably thinking I'm one of them.

Surprise. I love the iPad and am seriously thinking about getting one when they become commercially available. My main reservations have far more to do with Apple First-Gen hardware trends (both unexpected bugs and a quickly-lowered price point) than with any technical aspects of the iPad that I am currently aware of.

The thing that most people don't seem to be keeping in mind is that the iPad is meant to be something fundamentally different from a laptop or netbook.  A laptop is meant to be a portable computer.  A netbook is meant to be a cheap laptop that doesn't need to be quite as powerful.  The iPad, on the other hand, is not meant to be a portable computer.  It's meant to be the first of a new class of devices.  To borrow a term from fiction, let's call these "Personal Access Display Devices".  It's meant for viewing information and media (including internet, email, and chat), and some limited editing/creation/manipulation of said information and media.  It's meant as a peripheral device to a more advanced computer system, not as a replacement for the computer system itself.  As time progresses, it may even become a major input and output device for the main computer system.  It's potential is literally game-changing.

I just have one question for Steve Jobs, though.  Or, perhaps, a challenge:  when am I going to see an Apple Tricorder?
Saturday, February 6th, 2010 07:16 am (UTC)
I've considered trading in my current machine for an iPad! There's another computer in the house that I could use, for things where it's not enough. Still not sure, though.
Saturday, February 6th, 2010 08:28 pm (UTC)
I've heard their pricing described as a "land grab" ... although I think that was mostly about the unlimited Internet thing, I suspect it'd be hard for even an Android tablet manufacturer to compete with them.

Yes, case, definitely. Protective value, plus it just looks cool. I wanted to name my iPad "Spellbook" if I got one. >.>
Monday, February 8th, 2010 12:46 am (UTC)
Do you think you'll be able to make it a primary machine for you? I have a few doubts ...
Monday, February 8th, 2010 03:03 am (UTC)
Except that it's bigger than an iPod Touch and therefore more readable, right? (Although also a lot more expensive. >.< ) And also it's better for going online than the Kindle is.
Monday, February 8th, 2010 03:56 am (UTC)
So what happens if you start to find that you're using it more and more often, and your primary machine less and less? (Which I'm wondering if that's not what will happen with me ... )
Sunday, February 7th, 2010 07:06 pm (UTC)
Actually, if they can get that swipe-this-ap-over-from-your-computer-to-your-PADD thing going, then this will become a corporate MONSTER. The remote-desktop infrastructure is already there to make it work. It'd be massive.

And also all the things you talk about.

I've thought about it from the music standpoint - as a sheet music storage device, for example. Turning pages automatically or at least a lot more easily, maybe with a remote device prompter you could operate with your foot.

Oh man. If I still wrote code I'd write this in a heartbeat. Seriously.