jarandhel: (Default)
jarandhel ([personal profile] jarandhel) wrote2009-02-21 09:01 pm

Dreamhart.org Revamp

So far the comments I have received on the redesign of my website, http://dreamhart.org, have been mostly positive. And even those few which have not been positive have been informative, mostly since their content has given me a rather interesting view into who exactly among my friends has never read my website in any of its various incarnations. Still, I feel compelled to present the following time-line for the edification of anyone else who feels compelled to comment on the "recent" inclusion of certain obviously sensitive information on my website.

I first created a Reiki section of my website on January 9th, 2005. I created a link to it from the main portion of my website on January 10th, 2005. This is easily verifiable from archive.org copies of my website's changelog from 2005. Of particular note in this timeline is the original content and dedication of the WanderingPaths Reiki Annex. As well as the original content of the section on Imara Reiki, the original content of the section on Channeled Reiki Symbols, and the original content of the section of Reiki Links

Three years pass.  It is now 2008.  I purchased a new domain, and moved from http://wanderingpaths.heliwood.org to http://dreamhart.org.  It was announced in my livejournal on June 18th, 2008.  At this time the old version of my website was moved to http://wanderingpaths.dreamhart.org   The last update to that version of my website was made on June 21st, 2008 when I added a reiki symbol that I had channeled as part of a working on March 27th, 2007 and had never added to the Annex.

Another eight months pass.  It is now February, 2009.  I finally get off my ass and update the website, creating a new theme for it that had been in the works for a while and moving over to wordpress as a content management system rather than coding the site manually.  The completed redesign of the site and the move of all old content onto the new version went live and was announced publicly on Thursday, February 19 2009 at 03:26 pm.

On Thursday, February 19th 2009 at 10:19 PM I receive an email asking me to remove the aforementioned clearly sensitive information.

On Thursday, February 19th 2009 at 11:54 PM I check my email and respond to the initial request to remove the information.

On Friday,
February 20, 2009 at 12:07 AM I send a second email confirming that I have gone through both the new version of my site, and the still-extant archive of the old version of my site, and have removed the information requested.

Total time the information has been on my site: 4 years, 1 month, and 9 days.

Total time the information was on my site after the email was sent requesting its removal: 1 hour and 48 minutes.

Total time the information was on my site after I read the email requesting its removal: 13 minutes, which included hunting down all mention of it on the old version of the site and manually removing it from the html code.

So, given this time-line of events, can anyone tell me why it is that two days later, on Saturday February 21st I go to a party with friends and some of the comments I am receiving on the redesign of the website are not about any of the newly added content or the new look for the site, but are instead about the incredibly confidential information I "recently" added and how I shouldn't have gone and done that?

Like I said, it's certainly given me a good idea of who has never read my site before, but all in all it seems pretty damned silly to be stirring up drama over.
ext_5300: tree in the stars (Default)

[identity profile] helen99.livejournal.com 2009-02-22 09:13 am (UTC)(link)
> The presumption that seems to have been engendered was that the names
> were something new that I added during this revamp of my site, not that
> they were there all along.

I'm not sure why. Your name wasn't even mentioned and the use-of-legal-names being something new that you added was not something that was ever said. That would have been ludicrous, since a simple search yields about 30 instances of the names on our own site and myriad other sites. The problem obviously stemmed from something else. I suspect the people who saw the site derived these conclusions on their own.

> What it really comes down to is that Rialian is no longer comfortable
> with me using them, because of the arguments we had this past summer.

This is accurate. It a potentially more unfriendly environment right now since people have gotten a bit annoyed with each other.

[identity profile] jarandhel.livejournal.com 2009-02-22 09:40 am (UTC)(link)
> The problem obviously stemmed from something else. I
> suspect the people who saw the site derived these
> conclusions on their own.

I don't believe so. Rialian even presented the use of the legal names in his letter to me as if it was something new I had just done, and said it was rude of me to have used them at all when I had not done so for anyone other than him and Eyovah. If this is the same way he presented it to others, with them not knowing the history of the website themselves, they justifiably concluded that I had just added the names in this revision, not simply changed the layout of the site around. And I would have to say that this seems to have been the impression intended, since there was literally no other reason to bring it up to others at all.

> This is accurate. It a potentially more unfriendly
> environment right now since people have gotten a bit
> annoyed with each other.

*shrugs* Strange that it wasn't an issue before now, then. We didn't just suddenly start getting annoyed at each other when I revamped my site, that happened months back and no request was made between then and now for me to remove his or Eyovah's legal names from my website until the revamp. Nor did I make any drastic changes in how I was presenting his name or his material on my site during this revamp, other than basic layout. The only real changes in existing content were twofold: the dedication of the Reiki Annex to Rialian and Eyovah is no longer there, simply because there is no longer a separate Reiki Annex anymore, and in the Otherkin Links section I described Ri as "a very interesting person who I am glad to have known even if we don’t always see eye to eye" rather than "a very good friend" as it said in the old version because I thought it would be rather deceitful to refer to him with such familiarity when we are not presently speaking.

If potential hostility is the concern, fine. I have no issue with that. In fact, I really don't care what his ultimate reasons were for asking me to remove the names. I was happy to do so and did so with all possible haste once I received the request from him. I would have left it at that and considered the matter entirely settled by my two email responses to him. This only became an issue I felt I needed to take public when I learned that other uninvolved individuals were being informed about the revamp of my site in negative terms having to do with the inclusion of Rialian's legal name.
ext_5300: tree in the stars (Default)

[identity profile] helen99.livejournal.com 2009-02-22 09:54 am (UTC)(link)
No request was made because it wasn't a new site made in the new context (or more probably, because nobody thought of it). In any case, I'm sure you'll continue to believe what you already believe, so I'll leave it at that. I don't think there was a deliberate attempt to make it look like you added something new, but I'm pretty sure I'll never convince you of that, so good night from me. It's 4:54 am, wtf am I still doing here.

[identity profile] jarandhel.livejournal.com 2009-02-22 09:58 am (UTC)(link)
Very true. I actually just sent you an email to that effect, saying you wouldn't be able to convince me otherwise. But you're right, it is late. I'm only up because I couldn't sleep, myself. Sweet dreams, Helen. And I'm sorry you got drawn into all of this.